HAI is the first structured framework for measuring, scoring, and assuring human decision authority across AI-influenced systems. Not a checklist. Not a policy template. A governance standard.

When an AI system influences a decision — about a person, a process, or a resource — someone is still accountable for that outcome. HAI answers a question that no other framework has formally asked: how much authority do humans actually hold in that moment?
Not how much authority the policy says they hold. Not what the vendor promised in the sales deck. What is demonstrably, defensibly, measurably true.
HAI scores your organisation across five governance dimensions, producing a composite index from 0 to 100. The score travels with your assurance artefacts — into board reports, regulatory submissions, and workforce governance frameworks.


THE HAI SCORE
The composite HAI score runs from 0 to 100. It is not a pass or fail. It is a starting position — one that tells your organisation where human authority is strong, where it is absent, and where investment in governance will produce the clearest return.
Most organisations, on first assessment, score between 18 and 35. That is not a condemnation. It is a baseline. The fellowship exists to move that number — with documented evidence of every step.

The Fellowship produces a HAI score that your organisation owns. It is embedded in your board artefacts and revisited annually through the Alumni Circle.
Join us and discover what we can do for you.
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.